To tackle the growing plastic waste issue in Nigeria, rather than banning plastics, the solution lies in adding value to used plastic packaging. By implementing a system similar to the glass bottle return model, manufacturers could assign a monetary value to plastic packaging. Consumers would either return empty plastics for a refund or exchange them at designated points like supermarkets. This system could create a secondary market for plastics, making waste collection more profitable, and encourage recycling while minimizing environmental pollution.
One of the key advantages of this approach is its alignment with Nigeria’s existing cultural practices, such as the glass bottle return system for drinks. For decades, Nigerians have engaged in this exchange process without the need for sophisticated technology or government mandates. Applying this model to plastic bottles would be a scalable and cost-effective solution, especially since Nigeria lacks the infrastructure and financial resources to adopt Western methods like Germany’s automated recycling systems.
The author argues that by adding a monetary premium to plastic packaging, a market-based incentive is created. Consumers, particularly those from lower-income demographics, can benefit by collecting and returning plastics for cash or shopping vouchers. This creates purchasing power for marginalized groups and can help to engage them with modern retail environments like supermarkets, which they might otherwise avoid due to financial barriers.
However, for this system to work, it would require governmental action in the form of new policies and regulations. The government needs to mandate manufacturers to include a separate value for the plastic packaging and label the materials used (e.g., polyethylene, polycarbonate) to streamline recycling. Supermarkets and convenience stores could serve as the primary collection points, giving consumers vouchers for returned plastic, which can be redeemed for purchases.
Scavenger-based collection models, such as those employed by WeCyclers, face limitations due to the low intrinsic value of plastic. This model relies on goodwill and financial support from companies, and while it has had success, it lacks scalability. Automated collection systems, like those in Europe, are technologically advanced and beneficial but currently infeasible in Nigeria due to infrastructure challenges like electricity, security, and high setup costs.
The author suggests that immediate lobbying is needed to push for policy changes that will enforce these practices. Engaging manufacturers, traders, and the public is essential for the successful implementation of a plastic return-and-recycle system. The ultimate goal is to create a sustainable circular economy around plastic waste, which not only reduces pollution but also provides economic opportunities for the public.
The article concludes by urging stakeholders, including the government, manufacturers, and the general populace, to act swiftly in adopting this model, thereby addressing both environmental concerns and public health risks associated with the improper reuse of plastics.
