In a significant political move, Argentina has declared its intention to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO), citing profound disagreements over the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. This decision aligns with a similar action taken by the United States under President Donald Trump.
Official Announcement
On Wednesday, presidential spokesperson Manuel Adorni announced that President Javier Milei has instructed Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein to initiate Argentina’s withdrawal from the WHO. Adorni emphasized that the Argentine government has deep differences with the WHO’s management of health issues, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. He stated, “We Argentines will not allow an international organization to interfere with our sovereignty and certainly not with our health.”
Critique of WHO’s Pandemic Response
The Argentine government has been critical of the WHO’s recommendations during the pandemic, arguing that the prolonged lockdowns endorsed by the organization severely impacted the nation’s economy. Adorni asserted that the WHO’s directives led to extensive economic damage and accused the organization of lacking independence due to political influences from certain countries.
Financial Implications
Argentina contributes approximately $8 million to the WHO’s biennial budget of $6.9 billion for 2024-2025. While this represents a small fraction of the WHO’s overall funding, the withdrawal signifies a political statement that could influence other nations’ perceptions and relationships with the organization.
Domestic and International Reactions
The decision has sparked immediate criticism from opposition parties and health organizations within Argentina. Critics express concerns that withdrawing from the WHO may reduce access to essential medical supplies and support. Some argue that such a significant move requires congressional approval and caution against potential negative impacts on public health.
Parallel Actions and Policy Shifts
In addition to withdrawing from the WHO, President Milei has introduced other controversial measures, including bans on gender change treatments for minors and restrictions on housing transgender women in women’s prisons. These actions reflect a broader agenda that aligns with certain conservative policies observed in other countries.
Conclusion
Argentina’s withdrawal from the WHO marks a pivotal moment in its health diplomacy and reflects broader debates about national sovereignty and global health governance. As the situation develops, it will be crucial to monitor the implications for both Argentina’s public health system and its international relationships.
