When Nigeria finally celebrated the commissioning of the $20 billion Dangote Petroleum Refinery, it was sold as a dream come true — the silver bullet to end decades of fuel importation, forex drain, and subsidy politics. But less than two years later, the refinery is in the news for all the wrong reasons.

On September 25, 2025, management terminated the employment of all Nigerian staff, barely 24 hours after 90% of them joined the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN).

The sack, announced in a cold memo signed by Femi Adekunle, Chief General Manager of Human Asset Management, was wrapped in corporate jargon — “total re-organisation,” “cases of sabotage,” and “management appreciation.”

But strip away the boardroom language and what’s left is a mass purge of Nigerian workers, a move that exposes deeper cracks in the refinery’s foundation.

A Memo That Reads Like a Death Sentence

The internal notice directed staff to return all company property, obtain exit clearance, and await the computation of their final benefits. No dialogue. No negotiations. Just a swift and brutal execution of corporate power.

In a country where unemployment is already a ticking time bomb, the sight of one of Nigeria’s biggest private employers dismissing its workforce overnight is more than a business decision — it’s a political earthquake.

Unionisation or “Sabotage”?

The timing of the sack is impossible to ignore. Workers had just aligned with PENGASSAN, a move that would have strengthened their bargaining power. For months, the refinery and the union have been locked in a cold war over workers’ right to organise.

Now, the memo claims “sabotage” within the plant as justification. But the question lingers: was this about protecting refinery operations, or about silencing a rising labour force before it gained full control of the narrative?

Dangote’s Untouchable Status

Aliko Dangote is not just Africa’s richest man; he’s also a symbol of Nigeria’s paradox — one individual wielding more power over the economy than some state governments. With such influence, is the refinery too big to fail, or too big to question?

Critics argue that the mass sack is proof of a system where corporate giants can trample labour rights with little fear of government intervention.

After all, would Nigeria’s political elite risk clashing with the refinery that promises to “save” the country billions in fuel imports?

The Domino Effect on Labour Relations

The refinery is not just any workplace — it’s the heartbeat of Nigeria’s oil and gas future. If Nigerian staff can be dismissed wholesale for unionising, what message does this send to workers across other industries?

* That unionisation equals unemployment?
* That corporate power outweighs constitutional labour rights?
* That in the new Nigeria, jobs may be more fragile than contracts?

PENGASSAN, which represents thousands of oil workers nationwide, is now under pressure to respond with strikes or legal battles. The outcome will either embolden labour movements or cripple them.

What This Means for Nigeria’s Economy

The refinery’s success depends not only on machines and crude oil but on human capital. By sacking local workers en masse, Dangote risks being seen as running an enclave project — one that benefits investors but alienates citizens.

You May Like: Dangote Refinery Sacks All Nigerian Staff After Unionisation With PENGASSAN

If foreign staff are brought in as replacements, the optics will worsen. It would raise questions about whether the refinery is truly a Nigerian project, or just an economic fortress with Nigerian branding.

Nigeria at a Crossroads

This crisis comes at a time when Nigerians are already grappling with fuel price hikes, inflation, and subsidy removal. Trust in institutions — both public and private — is at its lowest ebb. The refinery, once touted as a national lifeline, may now deepen the feeling of betrayal.

The Dangote sack is more than a labour dispute; it is a test of Nigeria’s balance between corporate power, workers’ rights, and government responsibility.

Will the state intervene to protect its citizens, or will silence confirm what many already fear — that the refinery is a country within a country, playing by its own rules?