A furious claim from a former federal lawmaker has set off one of the most explosive political arguments of the moment: that Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, former governor of Rivers State and ex-minister, blocked Aliko Dangote from siting his mega-refinery in Rivers, allegedly by making personal demands and delaying negotiations.

Amaechi has rejected the charge outright, calling it false and politically motivated. The clash has quickly moved from gossip to a full-blown political fight with real economic and reputational stakes.

The Accusation That Lit The Fuse

The row began when Eld. Chidi Wihioka, a former member of the House of Representatives, told TV audiences that Dangote once planned to site the refinery in Rivers but left after a meeting with Amaechi.

Wihioka alleged that Amaechi kept Dangote waiting, then made personal demands that drove the businessman away, costing Rivers the opportunity to host what would have been a transformational industrial project. The charge has since been amplified online and in local political circles.

Amaechi’s Response: Denial And Counter-claim

Amaechi has pushed back hard. He insists Dangote never formally sought land to build a refinery in Port Harcourt and that the story is simply untrue. In his rebuttal — shared publicly — he says he even offered Dangote a suitable site opposite Onne Seaport and that he never demanded personal gains.

Supporters of Amaechi argue the allegation is designed to damage his reputation amid wider political jockeying in Rivers.

Who Else Has Spoken — And What They Said

The controversy has split local voices. Some elders and critics have demanded that Amaechi clarify the record; others — including notable APC figures — have dismissed Wihioka’s claims as false and self-serving. Chief Eze Chukwuemeka Eze, an APC chieftain, publicly defended Amaechi, calling the allegation baseless and insisting Dangote’s decision to site the refinery in Lekki was never hindered by the former governor.

The media swirl has included social clips, opinion pieces and defensive statements — typical theater when politics and big money collide.

The Prize

The Dangote Refinery — now sited in Lekki, Lagos — is not a normal factory. It is a 650,000 bpd, US$19+ billion project that reorders the national energy economy, creates tens of thousands of jobs, and shifts investment patterns across regions.

If Rivers had hosted (or even negotiated seriously for) such a project, the economic dividends could have been transformative for local infrastructure, employment and revenue. Claims that Rivers lost that prize — whether true or not — ignite very real feelings of grievance, lost opportunity, and political betrayal.

Beneath The Surface

This isn’t just about Dangote or Amaechi. It sits inside a broader fight over Rivers’s political future: rival factions in the APC and PDP, gubernatorial ambitions, and the way big industrial projects are used as bargaining chips.

Accusations about who “gave” or “denied” a project are shorthand for deeper fights over patronage, local contracts, and which elites get the jobs, land leases, and downstream spin-offs. In short: it’s loot, power and legacy dressed up as public policy.

Investors Watch Closely — Reputational Risk is Real

Every multinational and major investor monitors political stability and the rule of law. When public leaders trade allegations about who blocked whose investment, the message to outside capital is simple and chilling: land deals and mega-projects in Nigeria can be derailed by politics, rumor, or unrecorded private demands.

Also Read: Tinubu Sacks Digital Economy Aide John Umunubo Without Warning

That raises the cost of doing business — legal fees, risk premiums, and the need for stronger political risk insurance. If Rivers wants future big projects, this spat is exactly the kind of negative PR it cannot afford.

Inconvenient Uncertainty

At the end of the day, the Amaechi–Dangote story is a cautionary tale about modern Nigeria: the overlap of politics, personal ambition, and massive private capital produces narratives that become truth in the court of public opinion long before evidence is produced.

Whether Amaechi acted to stall a multi-billion-dollar refinery or whether he is the target of a politically useful lie, the outcome will shape political careers and investor confidence—and the public deserves clarity, not gossip.